WHAT THIS MODEL HELPS US SEE
The mark–wipe–groove sequence makes the deciding observation visible and keeps loose tool streaks separate from damage to the sample.
BUILD · Science · Week 10A · Explore
Sequence outcome: Rocks: test hardness.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Commit one first idea. Predictions are held, not marked. Pointing, selecting, saying or signing all count.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
The mark–wipe–groove sequence makes the deciding observation visible and keeps loose tool streaks separate from damage to the sample.
This is a relative classroom comparison with one tool and method. It does not give a Mohs number, prove construction strength or represent every specimen of a named rock.
Place a teacher-pretested dry sample in a stable tray. Use only the secured blunt scratch jig or a teacher demonstration.
Use the same tool, guide length, number of passes and safe force proxy. Never press harder to make an expected result appear.
Wipe the line with the prepared method, then inspect from the same viewing position for a remaining groove.
Word help keeps the scientific term visible and adds a plain-language bridge.
Same tool, same guide, same number of passes. Only the rock changes. Press the steps in order.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Use a button, point, say/sign or let an adult operate the chosen button. A retry is information, not a penalty.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Compare outcomes with cautious words: deep groove, shallow groove, faint groove or no groove under this method.
A clearer remaining groove means lower resistance to this particular scratch method; it does not measure every kind of strength.
If a sample flakes, crumbles or makes dust, stop. Preserve the observation and use the representative digital or image route rather than forcing a repeat.
The mark–wipe–groove sequence makes the deciding observation visible and keeps loose tool streaks separate from damage to the sample.
This is a relative classroom comparison with one tool and method. It does not give a Mohs number, prove construction strength or represent every specimen of a named rock.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Place each method or observation under the role it performs in a valid hardness comparison.
Claim: Hardness glitch: the heaviest rock is the hardest and cannot break.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Two teacher-pretested coded dry rock samples; stable trays; secured blunt scratch jig or teacher demonstration; fixed guide; wipes; hand lens; result card; eye protection where required by local assessment.
Same outcome: I can explain relative hardness and identify a fair, safe scratch method for comparing rock samples.
Use the in-page evidence gate and supplied representative mark/wipe/groove observations. Label them as model data, not results from the class samples.
Same evidence: A Rock Hardness Method Card with prediction, changed sample, controls, after-wipe observation and a relative conclusion within the stated method.
Choose groove/no-groove after-wipe cards for two samples and direct the adult through the same method.
Use pictures for tool, passes, wipe and groove. Complete: After wiping, __ remained.
Compare two coded samples with the same stated method and justify which resisted a groove more.
Use: We changed __. We kept __. Sample __ showed __, so under this method __.
Evaluate the controls, distinguish hardness from strength and propose one safe repeat or method improvement.
Preserve the first result and explain why the improvement would make the comparison more dependable.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Complete: hardness means resistance to __. After wiping I saw __.
Explain how the method distinguishes a tool streak from a groove and name two controls.
Give a bounded relative-hardness conclusion and explain one thing the test cannot show.
The familiar adult genuinely receives the pupil response, then says back the Science they heard or saw. The adult does not add a score or rewrite the pupil.
Receive the pupil’s Voice, complete real Audience, then choose what changes.
Session state is temporary. Reload clears responses; there is no account, upload or saved pupil identity.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Name: _______________________________ Date: ____________________
Learning objective: I can explain relative hardness and identify a fair, safe scratch method for comparing rock samples.
Retrieval: W9B: a useful comparison kept one criterion unchanged for every specimen. · W9A: visible properties helped us group rocks but did not reveal every tested property. · W8A: a fair comparison matched the number, unit and basis. · Lead-in: a scratch test needs a stated method before its marks become evidence.
The mark–wipe–groove sequence makes the deciding observation visible and keeps loose tool streaks separate from damage to the sample.
This is a relative classroom comparison with one tool and method. It does not give a Mohs number, prove construction strength or represent every specimen of a named rock.
Choose groove/no-groove after-wipe cards for two samples and direct the adult through the same method.
Compare two coded samples with the same stated method and justify which resisted a groove more.
Evaluate the controls, distinguish hardness from strength and propose one safe repeat or method improvement.
A Rock Hardness Method Card with prediction, changed sample, controls, after-wipe observation and a relative conclusion within the stated method.
Supported: Complete: hardness means resistance to __. After wiping I saw __.
Standard: Explain how the method distinguishes a tool streak from a groove and name two controls.
Stretch: Give a bounded relative-hardness conclusion and explain one thing the test cannot show.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Waiting for genuine Voice and Audience.
What was observed, and with what level of independence?
Local print output only. Reload clears in-page responses.