Source provenance register · BUILD Humanities W9–W14
Gate: what · who · when · where from · rights/use. Accessible versions preserve the Humanities decision. Constructed or adapted items never masquerade as untouched originals. Links are citations opened only when selected; lesson pages make no automatic network request.
| Week | ID | What | Type | Who | When | Where from | Repository | Reference | Rights/use | Adaptation | Classroom use | Can establish | Cannot establish | Access route | Checked | Checker | Review date | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W9 | HUM-B-W09-S01 | Tees Lower and Estuary Operational Catchment | Official environmental-data summary | Environment Agency; Defra Data Services Platform | Undated live catchment-plan page | Cited page | Environment Agency Catchment Data Explorer; Defra Data Services Platform | OperationalCatchment/3445 | OGL v3.0 unless stated otherwise; attribute Environment Agency/Defra. Do not reuse the page photograph without separate rights confirmation. | Adapted. Operational-catchment terminology, tributary detail, classifications and pSPA terminology omitted; river-to-sea extent, 18 km barraged reach and broad settlement/industry pattern retained. | Modern context for Lower Tees extent and broad land-use pattern. | Establish official modern geographical extent and broad lower-catchment land-use pattern. | Establish the complete historical river route, exact industrial location causes or past pollution levels. | High-contrast route strip plus a short plain-language card. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved core source; treat as modern context, not a historical map. |
| W9 | HUM-B-W09-S02 | OS Open Rivers | Open geospatial reference consulted for a constructed schematic | Ordnance Survey | Live product; release date varies | Cited page | Ordnance Survey open data products | OS Open Rivers product page; no dataset extract or geometry embedded | The product was consulted as an open geographical reference. No OS screenshot, map tile, coordinate extract or dataset geometry is embedded. If the dataset is later used directly, add the applicable OGL attribution and exact release/version. | CONSTRUCTED TEACHING SOURCE — created for classroom practice. It is not an archival original. The route is a not-to-scale schematic consulted against OS Open Rivers and the Environment Agency catchment description; it is not claimed to be data-derived geometry. | Geographical sense-check for a constructed, not-to-scale Lower Tees route strip. | Help check the broad river-to-estuary route when used with the Environment Agency description. | Establish historical river form, past land use or causal explanations. | Simplified labelled diagram plus ordered text list; colour is not the sole locator. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved as a consulted reference only. Do not call the schematic data-derived, screenshot OS Maps or reuse restricted embedded maps. |
| W10 | HUM-B-W10-S01 | Letter from John Backhouse to his sister describing the opening train | Digitised primary manuscript and transcription | John Church Backhouse; Science Museum Group Collection | Event 27 September 1825; letter written in October 1825 | Cited page | Science Museum Group Collection; National Railway Museum archive | aa110075124; archive identifier BACK | Descriptions CC BY 4.0; catalogue fields CC0; displayed manuscript images marked CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. No image is embedded in this pack. | Adapted primary-source context. Spelling modernised; private family/health content omitted; uncertain estimates not treated as verified statistics. | Evidence of what one young witness noticed and reported on the opening day. | Establish one witness’s report and the event date. | Establish exact independent passenger numbers or all observers’ views. | Short modern-English source card and labelled sketch description; full transcription remains in teacher notes only. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; describe him as reporting the event, not providing an exact statistical record. |
| W10 | HUM-B-W10-S02 | Leonard Raisbeck: Pioneer of the Stockton & Darlington Railway | Museum research article | National Railway Museum, Science Museum Group | 14 April 2023 | Cited page | National Railway Museum; Science Museum Group | Leonard Raisbeck: Pioneer of the Stockton & Darlington Railway | General website copyright. Facts restated in original wording with citation; no article prose, quotation or image reproduced. | Paraphrased context. Political, religious and legal disputes condensed; archival quotations omitted. | Coal route, railway purpose and reasoning around a Middlesbrough extension. | Establish coal as principal traffic and the network’s economic reasoning. | Establish the exact branch opening date; use W10-S03. | Labelled chain: colliery → wagon → Stockton wharf → ship → market. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved with precision; do not call the S&DR simply ‘the first railway’. |
| W10 | HUM-B-W10-S03 | Victorian Commercial Buildings in the Middlesbrough High Street Heritage Action Zone | Historic England research article | Lucy Jessop PhD; Historic England | 21 March 2023 | Cited page | Historic England Research | Research Issue 23; Victorian Commercial Buildings in the Middlesbrough High Street Heritage Action Zone | Text paraphrased with citation. Page photographs, historic maps and OS maps have separate rights and are not reproduced. | Adapted. Architectural detail removed; 1829 planned-town and 1830 branch/port relationship retained. | Chronology and purpose of the planned new town and railway extension. | Establish the 1829 and 1830 milestones and coal-port purpose. | Establish a single uncontested birthday for Middlesbrough. | Two-date card: 1829—town planned; 1830—rail branch opened. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; present 1828–30 as a development sequence. |
| W11 | HUM-B-W11-S01 | Ironstone Miners | Regional museum teaching resource | Tees Valley Museums Group | Undated live teaching resource | Cited page | Tees Valley Museums Group teaching resources | Theme: Ironstone Miners | © Tees Valley Museums Group. Facts adapted for classroom learning; no museum photograph is embedded because public republication rights are not stated. | Adapted. Long statistics, accident material and global-structure claims omitted; the industrial process and workforce movement chain retained. | The 1850 Eston find and connected mine–rail–works–dock system. | Establish museum-curated local history and broad industrial/workforce consequences. | Establish every worker’s experience or the metal provenance of every named structure. | Tactile or visual chain: ironstone → mine → rail → furnace → iron product. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; keep ironstone, iron and later steel distinct. |
| W11 | HUM-B-W11-S02 | 11 and 13 Zetland Road — entry 1137392 | Official National Heritage List entry | Historic England | Entry amended 5 March 2024 | Cited page | National Heritage List for England; Historic England | List entry 1137392 | Official list-entry text OGL v3.0. Credit © Historic England 2026, licensed under OGL v3.0. Embedded map and images excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Building detail removed; industrial scale and chronology retained in learner-friendly wording. | Official synthesis of the scale and chronology of Middlesbrough’s iron growth. | Establish Historic England’s synthesis of industrial scale and chronology. | Establish working conditions, household experience or causal shares. | Large-date and proportion comparison card with plain text. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; use ‘iron producer’ for 1865, not ‘steel producer’. |
| W12 | HUM-B-W12-S01 | Old Town Hall History | Local-authority heritage chronology | Middlesbrough Council | Page last updated 19 August 2026 | Cited page | Middlesbrough Council heritage chronology | Old Town Hall History | All rights reserved. Factual points restated in wholly original wording; no council map, photograph or extended text reproduced. | Paraphrased. Population, planning and movement evidence retained; unrelated chronology, purchase price and current restoration omitted. | Council-curated milestones in town planning and growth. | Establish around 25 residents in 1801 and the planning/port sequence. | Establish individual migrants’ motives, feelings or living conditions. | Before/after card: 1801—small farming community; later 1800s—rapidly growing planned town. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; link to the completed migration unit without stereotyping migrant stories. |
| W12 | HUM-B-W12-S02 | 11 and 13 Zetland Road — entry 1137392 | Official National Heritage List entry | Historic England | Entry amended 5 March 2024 | Cited page | National Heritage List for England; Historic England | List entry 1137392 | List-entry text OGL v3.0 with Historic England attribution. Embedded OS map and photographs excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Evaluative wording omitted; rounded endpoints retained. | Population endpoints and broad grid-pattern urban form. | Establish around 25 people in 1801 and over 90,000 by the end of the nineteenth century. | Establish like-for-like census boundaries, housing quality or services. | Two population counters labelled ‘around 25’ and ‘over 90,000’, with text alternative. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved with boundary caveat; always retain ‘around’ and ‘over’. |
| W13 | HUM-B-W13-S01 | Tees Transporter Bridge | Local-authority information page | Middlesbrough Council | Page updated 5 August 2025 | Cited page | Middlesbrough Council transport and heritage information | Tees Transporter Bridge information page | All rights reserved. Stable facts paraphrased; no council video or image embedded. | Paraphrased. Current closure, inspection, funding and repair information omitted as unstable. | Opening year and intended gondola function. | Establish that the bridge opened in 1911 and its gondola carried vehicles and pedestrians. | Establish current operating status or future reopening dates. | Original labelled gondola diagram with people, vehicles and river; equivalent text. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved stable facts only. |
| W13 | HUM-B-W13-S02 | Transporter Bridge — entry 1139267 | Official National Heritage List entry | Historic England | Structure dated 1911 | Cited page | National Heritage List for England; Historic England | List entry 1139267 | Official list-entry text OGL v3.0 with Historic England attribution. Maps and user/archive images excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Specialist engineering and damage details omitted; date, mechanism and dimensions retained where needed. | Official construction type, date and dimensions. | Establish the suspended carriage mechanism and official dimensions. | Alone establish the complete social reason for selecting a transporter design. | Simple side elevation with labelled suspended carriage and three-sentence description. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; ‘ships must still pass’ is a classroom design brief, not a quotation. |
| W13 | HUM-B-W13-S03 | Newport Bridge — entry 1139837 | Official National Heritage List entry | Historic England | Built 1931–34 | Cited page | National Heritage List for England; Historic England | List entry 1139837 | Official list-entry text OGL v3.0 with Historic England attribution. Map and archive/contributed images excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Motor, truss and material detail simplified; lifting action and 36 m clearance retained. | Bridge date, mechanism, clearance and Historic England’s significance assessment. | Establish the 1931–34 build, vertical-lift mechanism and 36 m clearance when raised. | Establish current lifting capability or mechanical condition. | Original two-frame down/raised diagram with movement arrows and text alternative. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved; phrase any superlative as Historic England’s recorded assessment. |
| W14 | HUM-B-W14-S01 | Celebrating 30 Years of Tees Barrage | Waterway-operator retrospective | Canal & River Trust | 27 August 2025 | Cited page | Canal & River Trust news and features | Celebrating 30 Years of Tees Barrage | Copyright Canal & River Trust. Facts paraphrased; no article text or photograph reproduced. | Paraphrased. Promotional wording and maintenance detail omitted; the 1995 opening and the operator’s account of earlier conservation/recovery are retained without making the barrage the sole cause. | Operator’s historical account of damage, conservation work and the 1995 barrage. | Establish the operator’s dated account and barrage purpose. | Independently measure ecological recovery or assign it to one action. | Three-stage card: damage → many recovery actions → continuing care. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved with causal caution. Use the directly supported multi-action wording: water-quality investment, habitat creation/management and conservation partnerships; add an Environment Agency source before making a more specific regulation or sewage-control claim. |
| W14 | HUM-B-W14-S02 | Estuary Wildlife of the River Tees Gets Increased Protection | Official designation announcement | Natural England on GOV.UK | 7 May 2019 | Cited page | GOV.UK; Natural England | Press release published 7 May 2019 | GOV.UK text OGL v3.0 except where stated. Credit © Crown copyright, licensed under OGL v3.0. Images excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Policy quotations and technical detail condensed; designation date, approximate area, protection and recovery evidence retained. | Official 2019 designation decision and the coexistence of industry and coastal habitats. | Establish designation, approximate scale and Natural England’s official rationale. | Establish current population counts or prove all environmental problems are resolved. | Industry, nature and people sorting card with a short plain-language summary. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved core evaluative source. |
| W14 | HUM-B-W14-S03 | Cleveland’s National Nature Reserves — Teesmouth | Official reserve guidance | Natural England on GOV.UK | 2 September 2014 | Cited page | GOV.UK; Natural England | Cleveland’s National Nature Reserves — Teesmouth | GOV.UK text OGL v3.0 unless stated; images and leaflets require separate checks and are excluded. | Adapted OGL text. Visitor details and current advice omitted; habitats and species evidence retained. | Official description of dunes, grazing marsh, mudflats, seals and migratory birds beside heavy industry. | Establish designated habitats and Natural England’s dated published description. | Guarantee wildlife sightings or current access conditions. | Three habitat icons with text labels and a ‘wildlife beside industry’ comparison card. | 2026-08-28 | AI-assisted BUILD Humanities curriculum source audit | 2027-07-31 | Approved as a dated official description; do not present species presence as a promise. |