WHAT THIS MODEL HELPS US SEE
The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.
LAUNCH · GCSE Biology · Lesson 18 of 18 · DoLAUNCH · GCSE Biology · Week 13 · Do
Sequence outcome: Calculate and analyse outcomes using probabilities, ratios and percentages from monohybrid crosses.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Access changes the response route, not the GCSE Biology entitlement.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Commit one first idea. Predictions are held, not marked. Pointing, selecting, saying or signing all count.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.
The dataset is simulated, the inheritance model assumes complete dominance and one gene, and closeness alone cannot prove the biological assumptions.
From Pp × Pp, predict 3/4 purple and 1/4 white: 75% and 25%.
For 40 seedlings, calculate expected counts: 0.75 × 40 = 30 purple; 0.25 × 40 = 10 white.
Calculate observed percentages: 31 ÷ 40 × 100 = 77.5%; 9 ÷ 40 × 100 = 22.5%.
Word help keeps the scientific term visible and adds a plain-language bridge.
Pp × Pp. Probability of white = ¼. Press the expected counts, then judge the observed result.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Use a button, point, say/sign or let an adult operate the chosen button. A retry is information, not a penalty.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Use repeated batches: individual groups can vary more than the combined total.
A larger sample often gives an observed proportion closer to the expected probability, although exact agreement is not guaranteed.
Evaluate the model: useful for a simple monohybrid cross, limited for complex traits or unequal gamete/offspring survival.
The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.
The dataset is simulated, the inheritance model assumes complete dominance and one gene, and closeness alone cannot prove the biological assumptions.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Classify predictions, observations and valid conclusions, then repair the guarantee claim.
Claim: The observed ratio is not exactly 3:1, so the Punnett square must be wrong.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Blank Punnett grids, simulated repeated-batch dataset, calculator, formula strip, graph paper or comparison table and pencil.
Same outcome: I can calculate inheritance probabilities, ratios and percentages and evaluate why observed results can differ from predictions.
Use the local expected/observed lab and calculator route; results remain in session only and are not uploaded.
Same evidence: Visible working from cross to percentages, a correct expected-observed comparison and an evaluation naming chance, sample size and one model limit.
Keep this with the Lesson 18 of 18 evidence so the next assessment begins with the pupil's actual need.
Complete a partly filled square, convert 3/4 and 1/4 to percentages, then choose the valid data conclusion.
Formula and phenotype key stay visible; totals and first calculation are pre-positioned.
Build the square, calculate expected counts and observed percentages, then explain the small difference.
Use Predict → Calculate → Compare → Explain.
Analyse repeated batches and the combined sample, then evaluate sample size and the monohybrid model's limits.
No chi-squared test or Higher-tier genetics; depth comes from careful evaluation.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Convert 1 out of 4 to a percentage.
Compare 77.5% observed with 75% predicted in one cautious sentence.
Explain how chance and sample size affect the difference between observed and predicted outcomes.
The familiar adult genuinely receives the pupil response, then says back the Science they heard or saw. The adult does not add a score or rewrite the pupil.
Receive the pupil’s Voice, complete real Audience, then choose what changes.
Session state is temporary. Reload clears responses; there is no account, upload or saved pupil identity.
LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Name: _______________________________ Date: ____________________
Learning objective: I can calculate inheritance probabilities, ratios and percentages and evaluate why observed results can differ from predictions.
Retrieval: Lesson 17: Pp × Pp predicts PP, Pp, Pp and pp. · Lesson 17: predicted phenotype ratio is 3 purple : 1 white. · Lessons 10–12: a percentage needs a frequency and a total. · Lead-in: would 31 purple and 9 white out of 40 contradict a 75% : 25% prediction?
The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.
The dataset is simulated, the inheritance model assumes complete dominance and one gene, and closeness alone cannot prove the biological assumptions.
Complete a partly filled square, convert 3/4 and 1/4 to percentages, then choose the valid data conclusion.
Build the square, calculate expected counts and observed percentages, then explain the small difference.
Analyse repeated batches and the combined sample, then evaluate sample size and the monohybrid model's limits.
Visible working from cross to percentages, a correct expected-observed comparison and an evaluation naming chance, sample size and one model limit.
Supported: Convert 1 out of 4 to a percentage.
Standard: Compare 77.5% observed with 75% predicted in one cautious sentence.
Stretch: Explain how chance and sample size affect the difference between observed and predicted outcomes.
The inheritance step I need to retrieve first is ________________________________________
The evidence that will show I am secure is ________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Waiting for genuine Voice and Audience.
What was observed, and with what level of independence?
Local print output only. Reload clears in-page responses.