← Lessons
Lesson overview

LAUNCH · GCSE Biology · Lesson 18 of 18 · Do

Inheritance Data: Predict, Calculate, Evaluate

Sequence outcome: Calculate and analyse outcomes using probabilities, ratios and percentages from monohybrid crosses.

🎯 Learning objective: I can calculate inheritance probabilities, ratios and percentages and evaluate why observed results can differ from predictions.
✅ Success criteria
  • I can convert Punnett outcomes into fractions, ratios and percentages.
  • I can calculate observed percentages from a dataset.
  • I can compare observed and predicted outcomes and explain the role of chance and sample size.
Arrival · previous learningStarter · observe / predictI Do · model the reasoningWe Do · hinge & responseI Do 2 · connect / extendWe Do 2 · scientific model / dataIndependent · evidence & transferExit · receive and use the response
🧪 Probability Lab: compare Punnett predictions with observed seedlings without calling chance an error.⏱ 40 minutes📍 C43 only🔁 Live Lundy loop↺ Retry without penalty
🎯PREDICTfrom the square🧮CALCULATEfrequency ÷ total × 100🔎EVALUATEchance and sample size
QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 3 min
🚪 Arrival · previous learning
Retrieve only what has already been taught
  1. W13L2: Pp × Pp predicts PP, Pp, Pp and pp.
  2. W13L2: predicted phenotype ratio is 3 purple : 1 white.
  3. Lessons 10–12: a percentage needs a frequency and a total.
  4. Lead-in: would 31 purple and 9 white out of 40 contradict a 75% : 25% prediction?
New to this class, absent, or not sure? Everything needed is in the retrieval box above. Read it, point to it or ask a familiar adult to read it exactly.
◆ Supported
  1. Complete: 3 out of 4 = __%.
  2. Point to the recessive phenotype in the P/p model.
  3. Choose the total in 31 purple and 9 white.
  4. Lead-in: calculate 10 ÷ 40 × 100.
▲ Standard
  1. State the phenotype ratio for Pp × Pp.
  2. Convert 1/4 to a percentage.
  3. Calculate the total of 31 and 9.
  4. Lead-in: distinguish expected from guaranteed.
★ Stretch
  1. Explain why each offspring probability resets.
  2. Compare genotype ratio with phenotype ratio.
  3. Name one factor that makes observed proportions vary.
  4. Lead-in: predict how a larger sample usually affects random deviation from expectation.
LAUNCH response routes
📝 write / edit🗣 structured verbal📏 measure / calculate📊 graph / interpret🧪 practical / demonstrate↺ re-attempt

Access changes the response route, not the GCSE Biology entitlement.

🔊 Read-aloud route: a familiar adult may read the task exactly while the text remains visible. No device voice or media permission is required.
QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 3 min
🌱 Starter · observe / predict

A Pp × Pp cross produced 31 purple and 9 white seedlings. Which first calculation enables comparison with 75% : 25%?

LOCAL VISUAL HOOK · FRAME 1
EXPECTED · model probability
Pp × Pp → 3 purple : 1 white40 seedlings: 0.75 × 40 = 30 purple, 0.25 × 40 = 10 white expected
Probability × total = expected count.
LOCAL VISUAL HOOK · FRAME 2
OBSERVED · recorded frequency
observed: 31 purple, 9 white31 ÷ 40 × 100 = 77.5% · 9 ÷ 40 × 100 = 22.5%
Close, not identical.
LOCAL VISUAL HOOK · FRAME 3
COMPARE · same unit, cautious conclusion
77.5% vs 75% expected — consistent with the modelchance decides each seed; a bigger sample usually lands closer to 3:1
Observed differs from expected because each outcome is a chance event.

Commit one first idea. Predictions are held, not marked. Pointing, selecting, saying or signing all count.

QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 4 min
👩‍🏫 I Do · model the reasoning

Make the first scientific idea visible

PROBABILITYchance of an outcomea numerical measure from 0 to 1, or 0% to 100%, describing how likely an outcome is
RATIOrelative amountsa comparison of quantities written in the same order
SAMPLE SIZEnumber observedthe total number of individuals or results included in a dataset

WHAT THIS MODEL HELPS US SEE

The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.

WHAT THIS MODEL DOES NOT SHOW

The dataset is simulated, the inheritance model assumes complete dominance and one gene, and closeness alone cannot prove the biological assumptions.

Step 1

From Pp × Pp, predict 3/4 purple and 1/4 white: 75% and 25%.

Step 2

For 40 seedlings, calculate expected counts: 0.75 × 40 = 30 purple; 0.25 × 40 = 10 white.

Step 3

Calculate observed percentages: 31 ÷ 40 × 100 = 77.5%; 9 ÷ 40 × 100 = 22.5%.

Word help keeps the scientific term visible and adds a plain-language bridge.

🎲 Expected vs observed

Pp × Pp. Probability of white = ¼. Press the expected counts, then judge the observed result.

80 seedlings — expected white?
¼ × 80 = ?
Observed 17 white of 80. Which conclusion?
Same unit (percentages) before you compare.
Foundation tier: no chi-squared test. Bigger sample → observed usually closer to expected.
QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 4 min
🤝 We Do · hinge & response

Which comparison is scientifically correct?

Everyone commits before explanation.

Use a button, point, say/sign or let an adult operate the chosen button. A retry is information, not a penalty.

QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 3 min
👩‍🏫 I Do 2 · connect / extend

Connect the model to the second idea

Connection: the model is useful when its visible pattern is translated into a scientific explanation.
Connection 1

Use repeated batches: individual groups can vary more than the combined total.

Connection 2

A larger sample often gives an observed proportion closer to the expected probability, although exact agreement is not guaranteed.

Connection 3

Evaluate the model: useful for a simple monohybrid cross, limited for complex traits or unequal gamete/offspring survival.

MODEL STRENGTH

The expected-versus-observed table puts counts and percentages in the same unit and makes random variation visible.

MODEL LIMIT

The dataset is simulated, the inheritance model assumes complete dominance and one gene, and closeness alone cannot prove the biological assumptions.

QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 4 min
🤝 We Do 2 · scientific model / data

Expected versus observed data lab

Classify predictions, observations and valid conclusions, then repair the guarantee claim.

PREDICTCOUNTPERCENTCOMPAREEVALUATE

Cards to place

Matching groups

No statement classified. Keep expected and observed separate until both are percentages.

🧩 Science glitch · find and repair it

Claim: The observed ratio is not exactly 3:1, so the Punnett square must be wrong.

QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 15 min
✏️ Independent · evidence & transfer

Complete a full inheritance data response: Punnett prediction, ratios, probabilities, observed percentages and evaluation.

👐 Physical route

Blank Punnett grids, simulated repeated-batch dataset, calculator, formula strip, graph paper or comparison table and pencil.

Same outcome: I can calculate inheritance probabilities, ratios and percentages and evaluate why observed results can differ from predictions.

🖥 Offline digital / director route

Use the local expected/observed lab and calculator route; results remain in session only and are not uploaded.

Same evidence: Visible working from cross to percentages, a correct expected-observed comparison and an evaluation naming chance, sample size and one model limit.

🧰 Equipment / setupBlank Punnett grids, simulated repeated-batch dataset, calculator, formula strip, graph paper or comparison table and pencil.
🛡 Safety / sensoryUse fictional plant data only. No personal genotype, family history or medical-risk calculation is requested.
🖥 Offline parityUse the local expected/observed lab and calculator route; results remain in session only and are not uploaded.
No-equipment/access route: The pupil selects the operation and dictates reasoning while an adult enters numbers, plots or scribes exact words.

📨 Next-check card

Keep this with the Lesson 18 of 18 evidence so the next assessment begins with the pupil's actual need.

◆ Supported

Complete a partly filled square, convert 3/4 and 1/4 to percentages, then choose the valid data conclusion.

Scaffold

Formula and phenotype key stay visible; totals and first calculation are pre-positioned.

▲ Standard

Build the square, calculate expected counts and observed percentages, then explain the small difference.

Scaffold

Use Predict → Calculate → Compare → Explain.

★ Stretch

Analyse repeated batches and the combined sample, then evaluate sample size and the monohybrid model's limits.

Scaffold

No chi-squared test or Higher-tier genetics; depth comes from careful evaluation.

Evidence gate

1 · Pupil decisionPrediction, question, method or choice is visible.
2 · Observable evidenceA result, source note, model state or adult observation is preserved.
3 · Pupil meaningVisible working from cross to percentages, a correct expected-observed comparison and an evaluation naming chance, sample size and one model limit.
QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

⏱ 4 min
🎫 Exit · receive and use the response

Finish with an edit or re-attempt on the existing work

Supported

Convert 1 out of 4 to a percentage.

Standard

Compare 77.5% observed with 75% predicted in one cautious sentence.

Stretch

Explain how chance and sample size affect the difference between observed and predicted outcomes.

Adult Audience

The familiar adult genuinely receives the pupil response, then says back the Science they heard or saw. The adult does not add a score or rewrite the pupil.

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Session state is temporary. Reload clears responses; there is no account, upload or saved pupil identity.

QUESTIONEVIDENCEPATTERNEXPLANATIONAPPLICATIONEVALUATION

LAUNCH rule: explanation is earned through prediction, observation, measurement, calculation or reasoning from evidence.

🛡 SPACE
🗣 VOICE
👂 AUDIENCE
⚙ INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting