WHAT THIS MODEL HELPS US SEE
The before-and-after route keeps the claim connected to something observable rather than a promise or poster.
GROW · Science · Week 11B · Do
Sequence outcome: Describe causes and effects of global warming and how to reduce our impact.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Commit one first idea. Predictions are held, not marked. Pointing, selecting, saying or signing all count.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
The before-and-after route keeps the claim connected to something observable rather than a promise or poster.
Light-on minutes suggest possible electricity savings only when the same lamps and conditions are compared; they do not measure a global climate result.
Problem: lights are sometimes left on in empty rooms, using electricity unnecessarily.
Action and mechanism: switch them off safely; where fossil fuels supply energy, lower demand can mean fewer emissions.
Contrast: safe shade lowers heat exposure. It is useful adaptation, but it does not directly reduce the cause.
Word help keeps the scientific term visible and adds a plain-language bridge.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Use a button, point, say/sign or let an adult operate the chosen button. A retry is information, not a penalty.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Baseline: record what happens before the change. Prediction: state what should change and why.
Action: make only a teacher-approved safe change. Measure repeatedly using the same rule.
Review: compare the evidence and keep 'not yet known' if the evidence is too weak.
The before-and-after route keeps the claim connected to something observable rather than a promise or poster.
Light-on minutes suggest possible electricity savings only when the same lamps and conditions are compared; they do not measure a global climate result.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Sort each card as Mitigation, Adaptation or Evidence check. Use the fictional data only to practise reasoning.
Claim: Wasted-light time fell, so this one action fixed climate change.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Scenario cards; before/after planning mat; pencil; optional local data-strip route.
Same outcome: I can explain how an action reduces climate impact, distinguish reducing causes from coping with effects, and plan evidence to check whether it worked.
Use the on-screen scenario and fictional before/after cards, then give the action, mechanism and measure by pointing, speaking, typing in a pupil document or exact adult scribing.
Same evidence: A safe action-to-mechanism chain, baseline, repeated measure, comparable condition and one limitation.
Keep this pupil-owned card with the lesson evidence so Lessons 9–10 starts from the chosen question.
Select labelled cards for Action, How it helps and What we measure.
Choose between two approved scenarios and use a before/after picture strip.
Complete the full plan with a baseline, prediction, repeated measure and one controlled condition.
Use the prompt: If we ___, then ___ because ___. We will measure ___.
Compare mitigation with adaptation and identify one confounding factor or evidence limit.
Explain why the result must stay local and provisional until the evidence is collected.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Mitigation or adaptation: switching off an unused light?
Explain one action-to-mechanism chain.
Name the measure, one limitation and why success cannot be claimed before evidence.
The familiar adult genuinely receives the pupil response, then says back the Science they heard or saw. The adult does not add a score or rewrite the pupil.
Receive the pupil’s Voice, complete real Audience, then choose what changes.
Session state is temporary. Reload clears responses; there is no account, upload or saved pupil identity.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Name: _______________________________ Date: ____________________
Learning objective: I can explain how an action reduces climate impact, distinguish reducing causes from coping with effects, and plan evidence to check whether it worked.
Retrieval: Lesson 7: extra greenhouse gases strengthen the greenhouse effect. · Lessons 5–6: a finding needs relevant, traceable evidence. · W5: compare fairly and repeat measurements. · Lead-in: what should we measure before saying an action worked?
The before-and-after route keeps the claim connected to something observable rather than a promise or poster.
Light-on minutes suggest possible electricity savings only when the same lamps and conditions are compared; they do not measure a global climate result.
Select labelled cards for Action, How it helps and What we measure.
Complete the full plan with a baseline, prediction, repeated measure and one controlled condition.
Compare mitigation with adaptation and identify one confounding factor or evidence limit.
A safe action-to-mechanism chain, baseline, repeated measure, comparable condition and one limitation.
Supported: Mitigation or adaptation: switching off an unused light?
Standard: Explain one action-to-mechanism chain.
Stretch: Name the measure, one limitation and why success cannot be claimed before evidence.
The safe question I choose for Lessons 9–10 is ______. ________________________________________
We will measure ______. ________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Waiting for genuine Voice and Audience.
What was observed, and with what level of independence?
Local print output only. Reload clears in-page responses.