WHAT THIS MODEL HELPS US SEE
Use: The pilot showed __. This affects the method because __. We revised __ to __. For W14, the route is __.
BUILD · Science · Week 13B · Do
Sequence outcome: Pilot and revise a simple fair-test method ready for the full rock investigation.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Commit one first idea. Predictions are held, not marked. Pointing, selecting, saying or signing all count.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
V1 with a red leak flag
V2 with a seal-check step, clear mL heading and W14-ready gate
Use: The pilot showed __. This affects the method because __. We revised __ to __. For W14, the route is __.
A successful pilot only shows that the procedure can be followed and recorded under practice conditions. It does not prove the final samples will produce a pattern or answer the investigation question.
Keep final Samples A and B out of the pilot. Use one clearly labelled practice sample or the fixed pilot log so today cannot become the full comparison.
Follow the checklist: stable tray, seal check, 5 mL, timer ready, 120 seconds, collector in mL, stop rule and clear recording box.
Record procedure evidence such as seal held, timer clear or unit missing. The pilot value is not used to decide which final rock is more permeable.
Word help keeps the scientific term visible and adds a plain-language bridge.
Each card is something a team saw. Press it, then press what it means.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Use a button, point, say/sign or let an adult operate the chosen button. A retry is information, not a penalty.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Compare method version 1 with version 2. Highlight the exact changed instruction, such as check the seal all the way around before adding water.
Run a readiness check: can another person identify the practice sample, volume, time, unit, collector, stop rule and blank final table without asking what you meant?
Issue one decision: READY FOR W14, REPAIR THEN REVIEW or USE FIXED DIGITAL/DATA ROUTE. None of these decisions includes a final permeability conclusion.
Use: The pilot showed __. This affects the method because __. We revised __ to __. For W14, the route is __.
A successful pilot only shows that the procedure can be followed and recorded under practice conditions. It does not prove the final samples will produce a pattern or answer the investigation question.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Route each pilot note to KEEP, REPAIR or W14 READINESS. Do not route any card to a final rock conclusion.
Claim: Pilot glitch: the first practice value proves which final rock will be most permeable.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
One clearly labelled staff-prepared practice rig or fixed pilot log; stable tray; 5 mL needle-free tool; 120-second timer; collector; wipes; method V1/V2 sheet; readiness card.
Same outcome: I can carry out or direct a small method pilot, identify a procedural problem and revise the plan ready for W14.
Use fixed pilot P1/P2 records: P1 edge leak and missing unit; V2 adds seal check and mL heading; P2 seal holds. Make the same revision and readiness decision.
Same evidence: Pilot checklist, one procedure observation or fault, method V1 and visibly revised V2, safety/access decision, W14 readiness card and a statement of what the pilot cannot conclude.
Sequence the practice steps, choose one fault card and one matching repair, then select ready, review or fixed route for W14.
Use: The pilot showed __. We changed __. For W14 we will __.
Complete the pilot log, justify one precise revision and issue an evidence-based readiness decision.
Keep method observation, revision and readiness in separate boxes; leave final conclusion blank.
Evaluate whether the revision fixes the identified fault without creating a new variable, then specify the W14 approval conditions.
Explain why a successful pilot increases procedural confidence but not confidence in a final sample pattern.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Complete or point: The pilot found __. We changed __. W14 route __.
Describe the method fault, revision and readiness decision without giving a rock conclusion.
Explain why the pilot can approve a procedure but cannot support the final A/B permeability claim.
The familiar adult genuinely receives the pupil response, then says back the Science they heard or saw. The adult does not add a score or rewrite the pupil.
Receive the pupil’s Voice, complete real Audience, then choose what changes.
Session state is temporary. Reload clears responses; there is no account, upload or saved pupil identity.
SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting
Name: _______________________________ Date: ____________________
Learning objective: I can carry out or direct a small method pilot, identify a procedural problem and revise the plan ready for W14.
Retrieval: In Explore, the W14 plan changed only final sample code, measured collected water and kept volume, time, area, thickness and apparatus controlled. · Prior week: point to or describe one useful model. · Older learning: what makes an observation useful as evidence? · Lead-in: what do you notice in today’s first picture?
Use: The pilot showed __. This affects the method because __. We revised __ to __. For W14, the route is __.
A successful pilot only shows that the procedure can be followed and recorded under practice conditions. It does not prove the final samples will produce a pattern or answer the investigation question.
Sequence the practice steps, choose one fault card and one matching repair, then select ready, review or fixed route for W14.
Complete the pilot log, justify one precise revision and issue an evidence-based readiness decision.
Evaluate whether the revision fixes the identified fault without creating a new variable, then specify the W14 approval conditions.
Pilot checklist, one procedure observation or fault, method V1 and visibly revised V2, safety/access decision, W14 readiness card and a statement of what the pilot cannot conclude.
Supported: Complete or point: The pilot found __. We changed __. W14 route __.
Standard: Describe the method fault, revision and readiness decision without giving a rock conclusion.
Stretch: Explain why the pilot can approve a procedure but cannot support the final A/B permeability claim.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Waiting for genuine Voice and Audience.
What was observed, and with what level of independence?
Local print output only. Reload clears in-page responses.