Lessons
00:00
Lessons menu
Opening

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

How can water reach a leaf above the soil?

Learning intention

Explain the root–stem–leaf water pathway and use dye evidence to identify internal transport in a cut shoot.

Trace a route.

Use a marker to test part of it.

Success looks like

  • Trace soil water through roots and stem to leaves.
  • Explain what coloured internal pathways support.
  • State a limit of a rootless demonstration.
Retrieval

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Retrieve the connected parts

1. Which part takes in soil water?

2. Which part connects roots and leaves?

3. Does water usually enter as solid soil?

I do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

I trace the rooted-plant route

Soil → roots → stem → leaves.

Water moves through internal pathways.

Water travels through internal pathwaysSelected water path in a rooted plant: soil water enters roots, travels upward in xylem through the stem, reaches leaves, and some leaves as water vapour. Arrows do not imply that all absorbed water is lost or that root uptake was demonstrated by a cut shoot.Rooted plant: water pathWater entersthe roots.Water travels upinside the stemto leaves.Some water leavesthe leaves as vapour.These water-carrying pathways are called xylem.
Water travels through internal pathways
Diagram description

Selected water path in a rooted plant: soil water enters roots, travels upward in xylem through the stem, reaches leaves, and some leaves as water vapour. Arrows do not imply that all absorbed water is lost or that root uptake was demonstrated by a cut shoot.

I do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

I mark water in a cut shoot

Colour helps us follow movement.

A plain-water shoot is the comparison.

This setup has no roots.

Follow a visible tracerTwo cut flower shoots stand in separate cups, one with coloured water and one with plain water. Dye can mark internal water routes in the shoot; neither shoot has roots. The plain-water cup is a comparison.Cut shoots: this demonstration has no roots.Coloured waterPlain-water controlDye can markwater pathways.Cut stem
Follow a visible tracer
Diagram description

Two cut flower shoots stand in separate cups, one with coloured water and one with plain water. Dye can mark internal water routes in the shoot; neither shoot has roots. The plain-water cup is a comparison.

Continue within this stage’s shared time.

I do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

I inspect the interior evidence

Colour appears in internal paths.

Not all tissue is coloured equally.

Inspect inside, not just outsideSimplified adult-prepared stem cross-sections from the dye and plain-water comparison. Coloured spots represent selected stained water-carrying bundles, not uniform colouring of every tissue. Positions are illustrative and not a precise anatomy atlas.Constructed observation: adult-cut sectionsDye shoot:coloured internal pathsPlain-water shoot:no dye-coloured paths
Inspect inside, not just outside
Diagram description

Simplified adult-prepared stem cross-sections from the dye and plain-water comparison. Coloured spots represent selected stained water-carrying bundles, not uniform colouring of every tissue. Positions are illustrative and not a precise anatomy atlas.

Continue within this stage’s shared time.

We do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Sequence the evidence before explaining

Go to interactive investigation

B: setup.

C: stem colour later.

D: petal colour later still.

Constructed observations; timings vary in real demonstrations
StageDye shootPlain-water comparison
StartPlaced in coloured waterPlaced in plain water
LaterInternal red paths; then some red petalsNo red dye colour

Trace, test and limit the water claim

Use the rooted model and constructed cut-shoot records. Reveal each diagram after a prediction; timings are not a live experiment.

Decision 1 of 3

In a rooted plant, which route fits soil water reaching a leaf?

Choose, test, then explain together. Evidence diagrams appear only after your test. Diagram transitions explain the model; they do not represent real elapsed time. Use Pause model to stop transitions and model controls, or your device’s reduced-motion setting. The printed We do activity provides the paper route.

We do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Which claim reaches too far?

“Water moved within this cut shoot.”

“We proved how roots took up water.”

Use B to choose.

Hinge

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

What does an internal red path support?

Focus on evidence inside the shoot.

You do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Choose your science route

Complete the route and clues.

Write a transport explanation.

Challenge the overclaim.

You do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Make your own evidence record

Use the shared evidence.

Explain one choice.

Check a label or number.

You do

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Check what the evidence can show

Point to the clue you used.

Remove an unsupported claim.

Continue within this stage’s shared time.

Review

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Lundy loop: improve the shared account

Choose how to share.

Hear one evidence-based challenge.

Improve or defend one idea.

Which limit made the explanation more trustworthy?

Review

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Keep the useful change

What changed in our account?

Which evidence helped?

Continue within this stage’s shared time.

Exit

BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 6 of 7

Three final checks

E1. Which part takes in water from soil?

E2. Does water travel through internal stem pathways?

E3. Did the cut-shoot experiment contain roots?

My science task sheets

Choose one route with your teacher. Shared evidence and the exit sheet appear in every route. Your work stays here while the page is open; save it before closing.

Shared evidence • The water-path case file

Records C–F are constructed teaching observations. Real dye timing varies; use the evidence supplied today.

A • Rooted-plant model

Soil water enters roots, then travels inside the stem to leaves. Some water leaves as vapour.

B • Setup

Two similar cut white-flower shoots: one in red-coloured water, one in plain water. Neither has roots.

C • After 2 hours

Constructed observation: red lines appear inside the dye shoot’s adult-cut stem section.

D • After 24 hours

Constructed observation: some petals show red colour. Exact timing varies in real plants.

E • Plain-water comparison

Constructed observation: no red dye colour in the control stem or petals.

F • Water-level check

A separate open cup without a plant also loses some water. Evaporation is possible.

Route 1 • Build the water route

Word bank: soil / roots / stem / leaves / inside.

S2. The red paths in C are...
S4. Did the cut shoots have roots?

Route 2 • Write a detective explanation

Use the observation and explain what it supports.

Route 3 • Challenge the overclaim

A report says: “All water travelled up the outside. We proved root uptake, and every drop missing from the cup entered the plant.”

Exit and reflection

Point, draw, write or tell an adult.

Slide 1

TA Brief

Current stage

Objective

Explain the root–stem–leaf water pathway and use dye evidence to identify internal transport in a cut shoot.

Preparation

Method precautions

Practical alternative

All core reasoning uses the supplied evidence and can be completed in 40 minutes without a live practical.

Access and regulation

Supported: Short choices, word bank and pointing or adult-scribed reasons; same core scientific goal.

Standard: Make a short evidence-based explanation or record using the supplied information.

Stretch: Apply the core idea to a changed case, evaluate evidence or identify a limit.

Regulation: Preview the sequence. Offer seated observation, quiet paired rehearsal, private feedback and a pass from public sharing. Routes respond to current access needs, not a diagnosis.

Teacher answers

Retrieval 1–3

1 roots. 2 stem. 3 no; water with dissolved minerals is absorbed.

We do W1–W2

W1 B setup, C internal stem colour, D later petal colour. E provides a plain-water comparison. W2 root uptake was not directly tested; no roots present. F shows evaporation as another cause of lost water.

Hinge

First option correct. Internal tracer supports internal movement; no roots were present; dye is not natural plant food.

S1–S5

S1 roots, stem. S2 inside. S3 plain water without red dye. S4 no. S5 coloured water moved through internal pathways towards upper parts.

M1–M4

M1 soil → roots → stem/xylem → leaves, with some water exiting as vapour if added. M2 tracer inside stem and later petals supports movement within the shoot to upper parts. M3 no red dye appears without the dye condition, helping distinguish tracer staining from a pre-existing colour. M4 roots were absent, so direct root uptake was not observed; F shows open water can evaporate without a plant.

T1–T4

T1 inside staining contradicts outside-only movement. T2 the shoots were cut and rootless. T3 evaporation from the exposed water surface. T4 e.g. the coloured water produced internal stained paths and later petal colour, supporting movement through this cut shoot. It did not directly test root uptake or show that every drop lost from the cup entered the plant.

Exit E1–E3

E1 roots. E2 yes, through xylem pathways. E3 no.

R1–R2

Responses vary. Credit a scientific revision, evidence-based defence or relevant next question. A private or oral response has equal value.

Sources checked for this lesson

Word help

transport
Movement of a substance from one place to another.
xylem
Plant pathways that carry water and dissolved minerals.
tracer
A marker used to help follow movement.
water vapour
Water in its gas state.

Cold Call

Give thinking time. Invite a response by voice, pointing or showing work. A pupil can pass; check in privately when useful.

Pause

Take a quiet pause.

You can look away from the screen. Come back when you are ready.

The lesson and your work are still here. Close this box to return.

Lesson tools

Choose a slide or a print route.

Teacher Print Tools

Your typed notes stay here while this page is open. Save them before closing or reloading.