Plan and use a fair test of how card height affects shadow height.
Question: do taller cards make taller shadows?
A team changed height and distance.
Help repair its plan.
Success looks like
Identify the intended change, measurement and controls.
Repair a plan that changes two factors.
Use repeated readings to make a supported conclusion.
Retrieval
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Recall our shadow studio
1. What blocks the light?
2. Can moving a card change shadow size?
3. What unit measures our shadow height?
I do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
I spot two changed factors
A uses a 2 cm-high card.
B uses a 4 cm-high card.
Their distances are different too.
Two changes muddle the answerDiagram description
Two tests use cards with different heights. One card is 30 cm and the other 20 cm from the source, so both height and distance change.
I do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
I repair the comparison
Change card height only.
Keep source and screen still.
Keep card position at 30 cm.
One change at a timeDiagram description
Two tests use cards with different heights. Both cards are placed 30 cm from the source, with a fixed screen 60 cm from the source.
I do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
I measure and repeat consistently
Measure bottom to top in centimetres.
Use the same edge rule each time.
Keep all readings.
Measure one height in centimetresDiagram description
Front-view screen with a rectangular shadow beside a ruler. The shadow runs from zero to eight centimetres; use the same top-to-bottom measure each time.
The 4 cm card gives 8, 8 and 9 cm readings. What should the team do?
Measure one height in centimetres
The constructed table still supports taller cards giving taller shadows here. Real comparisons need consistent positioning and measurement.
All decisions checked. Explain one choice using the evidence, then save your work.
Choose, test, then explain together. Evidence diagrams appear only after your test. Diagram transitions explain the model; they do not represent real elapsed time. Use Pause model to stop transitions and model controls, or your device’s reduced-motion setting. The printed We do activity provides the paper route.
We do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
What should we do with 9?
Three readings include one difference.
Keep the evidence.
Check and repeat if useful.
Constructed teaching readings, not class observations
Card height
Repeat 1
Repeat 2
Repeat 3
2 cm
4 cm
4 cm
4 cm
4 cm
8 cm
8 cm
9 cm
6 cm
12 cm
12 cm
12 cm
W2. Can we keep a useful conclusion and keep the 9?
Yes. Taller cards gave taller shadows here. Keep 9, check the setup and repeat if needed.
Hinge
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Which plan is fair for this question?
Question: how does card height affect shadow height?
You do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Choose your investigation route
Choose the test controls.
Write a method and conclusion.
Review the strength of a claim.
You do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Use the evidence
Read or point to one clue.
Record what it supports.
Keep your explanation short.
Continue within this stage’s shared time.
You do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Make your own science record
Complete your chosen route.
Use a diagram, words or speech.
Check one answer with the evidence.
You do
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Check and improve
Does my answer match the evidence?
Have I explained why?
Improve one label or sentence.
Continue within this stage’s shared time.
Review
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Lundy loop: improve our account
Choose how to share one idea.
Listen to another explanation.
Use evidence to improve our account.
What makes our conclusion stronger?
A clear question, one intended change, controlled comparisons and honest repeated readings.
Exit
BUILD · SCIENCE · Lesson 9 of 10
Three quick checks
E1. What factor did this test change?
E2. Name one thing kept the same.
E3. Should we delete a different reading just to fit the pattern?
See the teacher answer guide for the three checks.
Slide 1
BUILD SCIENCE · The fair-test repair lab
Evidence: plans and repeated readings
Constructed teaching cases and readings. Source and screen are 60 cm apart.
A • Flawed comparison
2 cm card: 30 cm from source. 4 cm card: 20 cm from source.
B • Repaired comparison
Each card: 30 cm from source. Change height only; keep material, width and orientation the same.
Card height
Reading 1
Reading 2
Reading 3
2 cm
4 cm
4 cm
4 cm
4 cm
8 cm
8 cm
9 cm
6 cm
12 cm
12 cm
12 cm
W1. Name the change, measurement and one control.
W2. What should the team do with the 9 cm reading?
BUILD SCIENCE · The fair-test repair lab
Route 1 • Build a fair-test plan
Word bank: card height / shadow height / same / repeat.
S1. What are we deliberately changing?
☐ Card height
☐ Source-screen distance
S2. What are we measuring?
☐ Shadow height
☐ Card colour
S3. Keep each card __ cm from the source.
S4. Do taller cards give taller or shorter shadows in the table?
S5. What should we do if a reading differs?
BUILD SCIENCE · The fair-test repair lab
Route 2 • Record a method and conclusion
Use the repaired plan and readings. Optional practical: use a separate record clearly labelled “our measurements”.
T1. Write the investigation question.
Task
Plan part
Your decision
T2
Change
T2
Measure
T2
Keep same: two things
T3. Write a short method including a repeat.
T4. Write a conclusion using two values from the table.
T5. Explain what to do with the 9 cm reading.
BUILD SCIENCE · The fair-test repair lab
Route 3 • Review the quality of evidence
A team claims: “Our test proves every shadow is exactly twice the card height.”
X1. Use the readings to identify a problem with “exactly”.
X2. Explain why the claim cannot cover every possible setup.
X3. Write a more careful conclusion for this setup.
X4. Suggest one method check and one extra reading that would improve confidence.
BUILD SCIENCE · The fair-test repair lab
Exit and reflection
Point, draw, write or tell an adult.
E1. What factor did this test change?
E2. Name one thing kept the same.
E3. Should we delete a different reading just to fit the pattern?
R1. Which idea did you improve after hearing evidence?