Progress Schools Tees Valley · Lundy Loop
Policy Alignment Matrix
Whole-school implementation companion · 2026/27
This matrix positions the Lundy Loop pack as an implementation companion below the approved policies.
These are working documents written by Matt Roper about his own initiative, shared as written. They record one teacher's proposals and are not an organisational position.
| Policy strand | Pack response | Leadership check |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback is meaningful, manageable and motivating | Live feedback is default; written feedback is strategic; no evidence is created solely for audit. | Is workload reducing rather than relocating? |
| Space → Voice → Audience → Influence | Every subject guide translates all four conditions and protects the R-gate. | Is Audience genuine and can staff explain Influence? |
| Build, Grow and Launch | Entitlement is constant; modality, support, independence and capture differ appropriately. | Are reasonable adjustments retained? |
| Intent, Implementation and Impact | The response informs the next task, plan, scheme, IEDP/APDR/EHCP/PfA target or assessment judgement. | Does formative evidence actually change provision? |
| QA and moderation | Use approved weekly visibility, termly moderation and half-termly quadrants; no additional loop tally. | Are leaders coaching quality rather than counting? |
| Safeguarding | Disclosure firewall stops the feedback process immediately. | Are discursive artefacts safe to store and review? |
Local decisions to minute: digital platform name; whether contrasting pupil colour is encouraged but optional; document status and owner; review cycle; any organisation-wide interpretation of weekly visibility.
Space → Voice → Audience → InfluenceDraft practice resource · Matt Roper