Humanities Aut 1 · 2026–27 · Enquiry: How far does a source support a claim?
| Key Word | Definition |
|---|---|
| Claim | An asserted statement to be tested |
| Support spectrum | Fully · partly · silent · undermines |
| Scope limit | A source can't exceed its moment/place |
| Purpose discount | Persuasive intent shrinks weight |
| Distance discount | Time between event and record shrinks weight |
| Measured verdict | 'How far' answered in degrees, cited both ways |
1) Name three source types.
2) 'The photo shows cranes.' Shows or suggests?
3) What is a claim?
4) What was found in the Eston Hills in 1850?
1) Tells, suggests, and…?
2) Can a source PARTLY support a claim?
3) Every inference needs a…?
4) Which claims least: shows, suggests, proves?
1) Improve: 'The source proves the port was busy.'
2) Sketch the support spectrum in four steps.
3) A source supports a claim for 1907 only. What's the limit called?
4) GCSE stem: 'How far does Source A support…' — what's demanded?
Key Question: Claim: 'Middlesbrough's dock was thriving in the 1900s.' Exhibit A: one photograph, one morning, 1907. How far can one frozen moment carry that claim?
Groups: ✅ SUPPORTS STRONGLY, 🟡 PARTLY / LIMITED, ❌ UNDERMINES. Sort: Port ledger: rising tonnage 1901–09, The 1907 photo — one busy morning, 1908 strike report: quay idle six weeks, Postcard captioned 'our bustling dock', Harbour dues receipts climbing yearly, Trade directory: two shippers folded 1905, A docker's memoir, written 1950, New crane investment minuted 1906
Draw lines to match:
Teaching archive — reconstructed from period records for this lesson. The documents are illustrative; the substance reflects Teesside’s documented history.
📒 Port tonnage ledger · 📷 1907 quay photograph · 🖼️ 'Bustling dock' postcard · 📰 1908 strike report · 📓 Docker's 1950 memoir · 🗂️ 1906 crane investment minutes
Counter-weight — undermines continuity · Moderate — vivid but momentary · Heavy — standardised, spans the years · Heavy — money moved on the expectation · Light-moderate — distance discount applies · Light — purpose discounts the caption
supports, partly, limit, detail, because, verdict
"This supports the claim because…" | "But it cannot show…" | "Overall the sources ___ support the claim."
For: two cited details. Limit: one cited. Discount: purpose/moment/distance applied. Verdict: degree words — substantially / partly / barely.
"Against claim A, ___ weighs heavily; against claim B it thins because ___" | "The scope of claim B exceeds what ___ can witness" | "My verdicts differ in degree because ___"
Every position must cite its details. A position with no detail is just an opinion.
| Position | What it means | Say it like this |
|---|---|---|
| FULLY | Several details align with the claim’s full scope. | “This supports the claim because…” |
| PARTLY | Details align with some of the claim — name which part. | “Strong for ___, but it cannot show ___” |
| SILENT | Says nothing on it either way. | “This is silent on ___” |
| UNDERMINES | Actively cuts against the claim. | “This weighs against the claim because…” |
📣 Purpose — it was made to persuade or sell. 🕑 Moment — it only witnesses one moment, not the span. 📏 Distance — it was recorded long after, from memory.
substantially · partly · barely — pick one and defend it. “Overall the sources ___ support the claim, because ___.”
Watch the scope. A claim about a decade is 3,652 days. Ask what share of it your source can actually witness.
Spectrum Board Record
1) My placements (source → position):
2) The detail that placed my strongest card:
3) Verdict frame completed:
How Far — Full Answer
1) Support 1 + cited detail:
2) Support 2 + cited detail:
3) Limit + cited detail:
4) Discount applied (name it):
5) Measured verdict:
Two Claims, One Source Set
1) Spectrum for claim A (summary line):
2) Spectrum for claim B (summary line):
3) Which sources shifted, and why:
4) Dual verdicts, both measured:
1) Name the four spectrum positions.
2) Why can't one photo carry 'through the 1900s'?
3) Every position must cite its…?
1) Name the three discounts.
2) Which source outweighed the photo, and why?
3) Answer 'how far' in one measured line.
1) Why did support shift between the two claims?
2) A source that undermines is still useful. Why?
3) Draft the GCSE stem this lesson rehearsed.
Space → Voice → Audience → Influence. The adult’s first job is Space: regulate before you educate.
| Space | The Courtroom corner is standing all term — exhibits stay handleable, and you may re-try any verdict. |
| Voice | Read your verdict sentence aloud as counsel; the bench (the class) may probe your cited details only. |
| Audience | Your best verdicts form the model-answer wall for the GCSE groups upstairs — real exam-year readers. |
| Influence | Choose Week 2's trial: which causation claim goes to the courtroom? Your docket, your call. |
Closing the loop: this one ends on paper — your own hand, or your words scribed by an adult. Saying it aloud starts the loop; writing it is what closes it. Pass is always allowed.
What I said, and what it changed:
Keep with your book / folder.
| Pupil name: | Date: |
| WWW (What Went Well): | |
| EBI (Even Better If): | |
| Level worked at: Supported / Standard / Stretch | Evidence filed: Yes / Not yet |
| Authorship — what I chose or decided myself: | |
| Support given — prepared / scribed / modelled / hand-over-hand: | |
| Pupil response — my next step: | |
LAUNCH Humanities · Week 1 · Source Investigation
Add your class once — names stay on this device only, and every Made by Matt lesson on it shares the list. Band each pupil so questions are tier-matched.
Pass is always allowed — passing still counts as taking part.