◆ Supported
Choose a source with the frame. An adult can read the extracts aloud.
GROW Humanities · Spring 1 · Week 16 · 40 minutes
Verbatim workbook outcome: Use sources to investigate a campaign for rights and change. · Investigate ideas of suffering and hope in a faith. · Trace: 'GROW Weekly - Spring'!C41 · 'GROW Weekly - Spring'!C53
Today we commit privately to what a source shows, reveal together, and look at two ways people answer a hard time: campaigning, and holding on to hope.
Choose a source with the frame. An adult can read the extracts aloud.
Choose, hold, reveal, and give a reason that names the source.
Choose and defend, then say what your source does not show.
No learner is asked what they or their family believe. Everything you use is on the cards. Nobody is asked to speak for a group they belong to, and nothing you say leaves this room.
You can work from the frame alone. You can dictate to an adult and the words stay yours. You can point to a card instead of writing. Each one is a full route.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
You have judged significance and written an account. Now you weigh sources against a claim.
The same source can be strong for one claim and useless for another.
Arrival decision: Take the three campaign sources and the two hope sources from the envelope. Everyone works with the same five.
In the envelope are five source cards. Three come from a campaign for a change in the law: a printed handbill, a photograph of a march, and a line from a council minute. Two describe how people in one faith have spoken about suffering and about hope.
Have every learner read all three before choosing. A choice made after one card is a first impression, not a judgement.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
The claim: the campaign changed what the council did.
Source A: a handbill asking people to come to a meeting.
Source B: a council minute recording a decision, dated after the march.
Source B speaks to the claim. It is about what the council did. Source A shows the campaign existed, which is a different thing.
The need for this lesson is that difference. A source about the campaign is not automatically a source about the change.
Try it: hold which card you would choose for that claim. Do not say it. Everyone reveals at once in a moment.
Do not take an early answer. The first answer spoken aloud becomes the room answer, which is precisely what commit and reveal exists to prevent.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
The diagram puts one claim at the top and three sources under it. The thick line runs to the source that speaks to that claim.
That is why you test a source against a claim rather than ranking sources on their own.
Modelled: claim, the council changed what it did. I test the handbill: it tells me a meeting was called. It does not tell me the council did anything. Then the minute: it records a decision, and it is dated after the march. Thick line to the minute.
Model the claim swap. It is the fastest way to show that usefulness is a relation and not a property of the card.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Claim 1: the campaign changed what the council did. Which card?
Claim 2: the campaign had support across the town. Which card?
Claim 3: the campaign went on for more than a year. Which card?
Commit first: write your card letter for each claim and turn it face down. Everyone commits at the same time, and nobody reveals until every board is down. Then we hold up together.
We will not all choose the same card, and the reveal is the point. When we compare, we ask what the card shows about that claim. A reason keeps a choice standing.
Wait for every board to be face down, however long it takes. A learner who changes after a reason has done what the lesson is for.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Look at the diagram. One circle, two boxes. When a time is hard, people work to change it, and people also work to bear it.
Both boxes can be true of the same people in the same year. Reading one as giving up on the other is the error to avoid.
Read together: the first card describes suffering plainly and does not explain it away. The second describes hope as something practised, in company, rather than something felt alone.
Keep the register descriptive. Nobody speaks for a faith, and nobody is asked whether they hold one. If a learner offers their own belief, receive it briefly and return to the card.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Point to the box. An adult can read the card again.
Commit to a box and name the words that put it there.
Commit, then say what the card does not tell you.
Everyone writes a box and a quoted phrase on a whiteboard, face down. Then we hold up the boards at the same time.
The card for this one describes people gathering every year to remember a hard time. Which box, and which words made you say so?
Scribe exactly, including the quoted phrase. The phrase is what makes the answer evidence rather than impression.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Make one record with two parts. Part one is the campaign claims and the sources you chose. Part two is the faith cards and the box each belongs in.
One claim with a chosen source and a scribed reason, and one faith card pointed to a box.
Two claims with sources and written reasons, and both faith cards placed with a quoted phrase.
Three claims with reasons, both cards placed, and what each source does not show.
Check yourself: does your reason say what the source shows about that claim?
Check yourself: did you quote words from the card rather than describe a feeling?
Check yourself: have you avoided speaking for anyone who holds the faith on the card?
A finished row: claim, the council changed what it did. Source, the minute. Reason, it records a decision and it is dated after the march, so it shows the change and not only the campaign. What it does not show: whether the march caused it.
Record route and scribing on the evidence line, keeping adult support visible and separate from the learner own words.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Read one reason to a partner. They say back which claim they think it was answering.
Did they name a different claim? Change one phrase so the reason points where you meant. That change is your influence.
Keep the record. The source work here is the same work the summer assessment asks for.
Close by naming one learner whose phrasing changed after a partner named the wrong claim. That is the influence record.
SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.
Use the least prompt needed. Keep adult preparation and exact-word scribing separate from pupil authorship. Guidance is hidden from the learner surface by default.
SoW: 'GROW Weekly - Spring'!C41 · 'GROW Weekly - Spring'!C53 — "Use sources to investigate a campaign for rights and change. · Investigate ideas of suffering and hope in a faith."
Learning objective: I can choose the source that speaks to a claim about a campaign, defend my choice, and say what a source shows about how people hold on to hope.
No learner is asked what they or their family believe. Every task can be completed from the supplied source cards.
Claim → source → reason. Then: card → box → quoted phrase.
The first row is done for you, from the claim we tested together. It is in italics so you know it is not yours.
| Claim or card | What I chose | My reason, in my words |
|---|---|---|
| the council changed what it did | the council minute | it records a decision, dated after the march, so it shows the change and not only the campaign |
One claim with a source and a scribed reason, and one card placed.
Two claims with reasons, both cards placed with a quoted phrase.
Three claims with reasons, both cards placed, and what each source does not show.
5 · Learner confirmation
I confirm this is my own work.
| Learner name (print) | Signature |
| Date |