← Lessons
00:00
Lessons menu
GROW · Humanities

Connected across the sea

Autumn 2 · Week 3 · 40 minutes

Learning intention

I can explain a connection between places using a source and a diagram.

Success criteria

  • Name the places and identify what connects them.
  • Use a named source for a claim.
  • Say what the source does not prove.

Use Next to begin. Ask for word help or your usual support when needed.

Arrival · 2 min

Find the two places

Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the diagram.

Teesport is in North East England. Rotterdam is in the Netherlands.

Use the labels and key. This drawing shows a connection; it cannot measure the journey.

Schematic goods connection between Teesport and Rotterdam.TeesportRotterdamGoods linksA port connection is evidence of trade.It does not explain every person’s journey.
Connection diagram, not a scale map. Check the evidence card for the source and its limits.
Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the diagram. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At Arrival, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the diagram” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the diagram” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Find Teesport and Rotterdam in the diagram” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: What crosses the sea?

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

Starter · 3 min

What crosses the sea?

Does every connection need a ship?

Goods can move by ship. Messages can travel through communication networks.

Both connect places. They move different things in different ways.

A youth group sends another group a digital drawing. What is being exchanged?

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Does every connection need a ship?
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Does every connection need a ship? Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At Starter, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Does every connection need a ship” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Does every connection need a ship” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Does every connection need a ship” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Source → route → claim

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

I do · 5 min

Source → route → claim

Use the operator's evidence precisely.

Source A supports a goods connection between the two ports.

It does not show every person's journey. A possible local effect is work handling cargo; that is an inference to investigate.

Schematic goods connection between Teesport and Rotterdam.TeesportRotterdamGoods linksA port connection is evidence of trade.It does not explain every person’s journey.
Connection diagram, not a scale map. Check the evidence card for the source and its limits.

A · Port operator report

In February 2021, PD Ports described cargo links between Teesport and Rotterdam. It announced work with Rotterdam on a digital port-information system.

Paraphrase of PD Ports, 11 February 2021. The operator is describing and promoting its services.
We do · 6 min

Which source supports it?

Choose a source, then test a claim.

Switch between A, B and C.

Notice what each source changes in the diagram. A population figure does not show a travel route.

A · Port operator report

In February 2021, PD Ports described cargo links between Teesport and Rotterdam. It announced work with Rotterdam on a digital port-information system.

Paraphrase of PD Ports, 11 February 2021. The operator is describing and promoting its services.

B · Population snapshot

Middlesbrough Council reports that 12.29% of residents were born outside the UK in Census 2021. This is about 12 in every 100 residents.

Adapted from Middlesbrough Council's Census 2021 summary; page updated 19 December 2025. Rounded display is labelled approximate.

C · Imagined youth project

A Teesside youth group shares digital music recommendations with a Rotterdam youth group. Nobody is described as travelling.

Constructed classroom example. It is not evidence of a real partnership or any individual's life.
Paper or spoken route

Use A/B/C cards, a blank connection diagram and a 100-square grid. Draw goods/messages with different line styles. For B, annotate the dated proportion and explain why no individual travel route can be drawn.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Choose a source, then test a claim.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Choose a source, then test a claim. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At We do, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Choose a source, then test a claim” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Choose a source, then test a claim” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Choose a source, then test a claim” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Repair an overclaim

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

I do · 4 min

Repair an overclaim

Does the evidence go that far?

Overclaim: “The port link proves everyone in Teesside goes to Rotterdam.”

Repair: “Source A describes a cargo link. It does not tell us where every resident travels.”

  1. Find the claim's biggest word: everyone.
  2. Look back at the source.
  3. Keep what it supports; remove what it cannot show.
Schematic goods connection between Teesport and Rotterdam.TeesportRotterdamGoods linksA port connection is evidence of trade.It does not explain every person’s journey.
Connection diagram, not a scale map. Check the evidence card for the source and its limits.
We do · 5 min

Goods and messages can work together

Build two different chains.

In our imagined project, the groups send a digital design first. They later post a small finished model.

Name what moves in each chain and how. The activity stays fictional even when it is realistic.

D · Imagined design exchange

Teesside group → digital design → Rotterdam group. Later: Teesside group → posted model → Rotterdam group.

Constructed scenario for practising two connection types.
Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · In our imagined project, the groups…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: In our imagined project, the groups send a digital design first. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At We do, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “In our imagined project, the groups send a digital design first” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “In our imagined project, the groups send a digital design first” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “In our imagined project, the groups send a digital design first” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Map a new connection

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

Independent · 12 min

Map a new connection

Explain this new project and compare it with A.

Use scenario E to draw and label one connection.

Then use the real operator card A for a second connection. Explain how they differ.

Add a possible effect and say which parts the evidence cannot prove.

E · New imagined project

A Teesside class emails a seed-growing diary to a class in Lille, France. The classes compare their plants. No plants or people are sent between the classes.

New constructed transfer scenario. Not a real exchange or a claim about all schools in either place.

Supported

Use E to label two places and what passes between them. Give a short reason for your category and point to one thing E does not say. Then identify the different connection in A.

____ connects to ____ by ____. The evidence is ____. It does not say ____.

No name is needed. Save your written notes before closing or reloading.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Explain this new project and compare it…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Explain this new project and compare it with A. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At Independent, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Explain this new project and compare it with A” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Explain this new project and compare it with A” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Explain this new project and compare it with A” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Claim, source, limit

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

Exit · 3 min

Claim, source, limit

Give one sentence someone can check.

Name your connection and source.

Add: “This does not prove…”

Choose one question for the next geography lesson.

Does B tell us why one particular resident moved?

Lundy Loop

Choose how to share. Your adult will listen and say what happens next.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Give one sentence someone can check.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Give one sentence someone can check. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At Exit, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Give one sentence someone can check” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Give one sentence someone can check” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Give one sentence someone can check” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on. Your adult will listen and say what happens next.

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Earwig, lean capture (E): 30-second clip, photo, or one-line context note. Central tags only. Listen / look before tagging (Audience).

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

Complete

Lesson complete

Show one thing you learned.

Tell your adult what helped or what needs another look.

Save any written notes you want to keep. Your teacher will agree the next step.

Use Print for pupil sheets or Back to revisit a stage.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Show one thing you learned.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show your answer here: Show one thing you learned. Short edit in margin; verbal reply; tick off success criteria; student voice clip.

At Complete, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Show one thing you learned” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Show one thing you learned” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Show one thing you learned” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Lesson complete

SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Earwig, lean capture (E): 30-second clip, photo, or one-line context note. Central tags only. Listen / look before tagging (Audience).

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

Slide 1

TA Brief

Current stage

GROW · Connected across the sea

Autumn 2 · Week 3

SoW

GROW Weekly - Autumn!C55

  • Describe how communities are connected across the world.

C55 is Autumn 2 Week 3. The original filename says W10, a stale absolute-week label. Matt's confirmed calendar places Autumn 1 enrichment in absolute Week 8, so Autumn 2 Week 3 corresponds to absolute Week 11. The pupil title uses the unambiguous half-term week.

Prior: Autumn 2 Week 2 used atlas and grid references. Retrieve the difference between locating a place and explaining a connection.

Next: Autumn 2 Week 4 investigates festivals of light in different locations. Carry forward source-led claims without assuming a person's beliefs from a country or map line.

Preparation

Care and safety

Teacher response guidance

Evidence of learning

Look for two located places, a correctly named connection, evidence appropriate to the claim and an explicit limit. Check that the pupil distinguishes scenario reasoning from evidence of a real partnership. Do not score factual recall about individual residents.

Access and independence

Use short cards, large place labels, a key with text and line style, and read-aloud support. Pupils may draw, point, talk or use exact scribing. Fade category prompts before E. Reading demand is a design choice, not a certified age.

Lundy Loop

Learners choose a question for the next geography lesson. The teacher receives their source-backed explanations and reports which diagram or source skill needs revisiting, with the reason. No external contact or public disclosure is part of the activity.

Arrival · Find the two places

Retrieve the meaning of a diagram key. Accept pointing or description. The drawing represents relationships and does not teach geographic position, scale or a precise sea route.

Starter · What crosses the sea?

The example is fictional rehearsal. Keep goods, people and information distinct, while allowing a real project to involve more than one connection.

I do · Source → route → claim

Model: 'A identifies a cargo connection, so I draw a goods link. Handling cargo may support local work, but this card gives no job total or worker's experience.' Distinguish an effect inference from a reported fact.

We do · Which source supports it?

Expected: A supports cargo connection; B supports a population proportion only; C supports reasoning within the imagined scenario. Do not infer faith, nationality or reason for migration from country of birth. The 100-square model is approximate, not 100 actual people.

I do · Repair an overclaim

The repair should narrow the claim, not deny the goods connection. Contrast 'some residents may travel' with 'the source establishes that they travel': possible is not proven.

We do · Goods and messages can work together

Expected: digital design is information; posted model is a physical good. Both connect the groups, but the scenario does not specify the parcel's full route, journey time or carbon footprint.

Independent · Map a new connection

Do not give the connection category before independent response. Look for information/messages, email medium and shared learning as a possible effect. Compare with A's cargo. Record fiction/real distinction; pupils should not cite E as evidence of a real school partnership.

Exit · Claim, source, limit

Use exit responses to decide whether the next lesson needs more work on diagram keys, real/constructed source labels or overclaims. Tell pupils what their responses changed in the teaching plan.

Misconceptions

A port route describes everyone's travel. Name what the operator actually reported: cargo. Population and individual travel need different evidence.

Country of birth reveals identity or religion. B only describes the recorded birthplace category. These are different questions.

A plausible fictional example proves a real event. Read the constructed label and say 'in this example' when reasoning.

The 2021 statistic describes today's population. Keep the Census 2021 date attached to the number.

Sources

PD Ports — Teesport
The operator describes Teesport's North East England location, sea-market links including the Netherlands and domestic road/rail connections. Avoids inconsistent cargo totals on the page.

PD Ports — partnership with Port of Rotterdam, 11 February 2021
A dated operator report describes cargo links between Teesport and Rotterdam and the planned sharing of port information systems. Used as evidence of a documented connection, not a live sailing timetable.

Middlesbrough Council — local population diversity
Reports that 12.29% of Middlesbrough residents were born outside the UK in Census 2021. A population proportion cannot establish any individual's nationality, route, reason for movement or beliefs.

Department for Education — Geography programme of study
Supports location, map interpretation and human-geography connections. The school's exact weekly outcome remains the controlling sequence.

Review trace

Humanities_Teesside/GROW_W9-W14_2026-27/GROW_HUM_W10_Teesside_Connected_World_OUTSTANDING_V3_1.html

Separate review copy. No live lesson or award record has been changed.

Word help

connection: A link between people or places.

goods: Things people buy, sell or move.

port: A place where ships load and unload.

source: Where our information comes from.

limit: Something the evidence cannot tell us.

Cold Call

Give thinking time. Invite a response by voice, pointing or showing work. A pupil can pass; check in privately when useful.

Pause

Take a quiet pause.

You can look away from the screen. Come back when you are ready.

The lesson and your work are still here. Close this box to return.

Lesson tools

Choose a slide or a print route.

Teacher Print Tools

Your typed notes stay here while this page is open. Save them before closing or reloading.