← Lessons
0 min
Lesson overview

Same Thing, Different Reason

BUILD · Humanities · Week 5. RE and World Views. Same Thing, Different Reason.

Objective: match three pairs of practice cards that show two groups doing a similar thing, say what is the same about each pair, and name one reason each group gives.

Success evidence: three matched pairs, one sentence for each saying what is the same, and one reason from each group.

Everything comes from the approved practice cards. You report what the cards say. Nobody is asked what they believe.

40 minutes. Offline.

3 min
Arrival · retrieve

Arrival · retrieve

Two groups can do the same thing

Lots of groups of people do things that look alike.

They light a light. They share food. They keep a quiet day.

Looking alike does not mean they mean the same thing by it.

It also does not mean they mean something different.

The only way to know is to read what each group says.

So today you match the pictures first, and then read the reasons.

Do not ask anyone what they do at home. The cards are the whole subject of the lesson.

You need the practice card pack, the matching mat, and the record sheet.

There are twelve cards in the pack this term. Six of them are pictures and six are reasons.

Every picture has one reason that goes with it, and it is written on the back.

Nobody has to guess. Guessing about what people believe is the thing this lesson is built to stop.

You will match three pairs today. Next week the pack changes and you match three more.

Some pairs are easy to see and some are not. Both kinds count the same.

Nobody in this room has to know anything about any of these groups to do this task.

Everything you need is on the cards and it is written in short sentences.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Lots of groups of people do things that…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Lots of groups of people do things that look alike. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At Arrival, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Lots of groups of people do things that look alike” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Lots of groups of people do things that look alike” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Lots of groups of people do things that look alike” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Starter · create the need

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

3 min
Starter · create the need

Starter · create the need

Two people light a candle

Here is a card of somebody lighting a candle.

Here is another card of somebody lighting a candle.

The pictures look nearly the same.

One card says the light is a way of remembering someone.

The other card says the light stands for a story about a lamp that did not go out.

Same thing, two reasons. That is the whole lesson in one pair.

Look at both candle pictures again and say one thing that is different about them.

The hands are different. The room is different. The candle itself is a different shape.

None of those differences tell you the reason. Only the writing does.

That is why we always turn the card over, even when we think we already know.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Here is a card of somebody lighting a…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Here is a card of somebody lighting a candle. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At Starter, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Here is a card of somebody lighting a candle” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Here is a card of somebody lighting a candle” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Here is a card of somebody lighting a candle” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: I Do · model

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

7 min
I Do · model

I Do · model

Matching one pair, then reading

I look at all the pictures first, without reading anything.

I find two that show people sharing a meal. That is my first pair.

What is the same? Both cards show a table, food, and more than one person.

I write that down before I read a single reason.

Now I turn both cards over and read.

The first says the meal remembers a night from a long time ago.

Matching a pair of practice cardsLOOKfind the pairSAYwhat is the sameREADboth reasonsWRITEone from eachMatching comes before reading, so the pictures are not read into

The second says the meal is a thank you at the end of a week.

Both are about a meal. Neither reason is the other one.

Match before reading, visibly. Reading first makes pupils pair by reason and miss the point of the lesson.

Watch me look at all six before I pick any two. Picking the first two that catch my eye is how a pair goes wrong.

I also say what is the same out loud before I write it, because saying it makes the vague ones obvious.

If I cannot say what is the same in one short sentence, the pair is probably not a pair.

3 min
We Do · everyone commits

We Do · everyone commits

Sort the pictures

Six picture cards are on your table. Sort them into three pairs.

Do not turn any of them over yet.

Sort them by what people are doing, not by who is in the picture.

Then say, for one pair, what is the same about the two.

When your table has three pairs, hold up the pair you were least sure about.

Two of the six pictures could go with either of two others. Pick one and be ready to say why.

There is no trick here. More than one answer can be right, as long as you can say what is the same.

If your table gets three pairs quickly, check the two you found last. Those are usually the ones to look at again.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Six picture cards are on your table.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Six picture cards are on your table. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At We Do, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Six picture cards are on your table” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Six picture cards are on your table” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Six picture cards are on your table” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: I Do 2 · connect

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

7 min
I Do 2 · connect

I Do 2 · connect

Different reasons is not a problem

Sometimes people expect that if two groups do the same thing, they must mean the same thing.

When it turns out they do not, that can feel like one of them is wrong.

Neither of them is wrong about their own reason.

A group is the best source for what a group means by what it does.

The same practice, two reasonsWHAT IS THE SAMEboth share a mealyou can see itWHAT IS DIFFERENTtwo different reasonsyou have to read itOne you can see; the other only the card can tell you

So write both reasons down as the cards give them.

You do not have to decide between them. Nobody is asking you to.

Write the group's name next to each reason, so it is clear whose reason it is.

A reason with no group next to it turns into a fact about everybody, which it is not.

Nobody speaks for a whole religion, and the cards do not claim to either.

Each card says what one group says, and that is exactly as much as we write down.

5 min
We Do 2 · lab

We Do 2 · lab

Read me the two reasons

Work in twos. Take one of your pairs.

One of you reads the first reason and the other reads the second.

Then both say, together, what is the same about the pair.

If you disagree about what is the same, look at the pictures again, not at the reasons.

Then take a different pair and do it again.

Read the reason exactly as it is written the first time. Say it your way afterwards.

Doing it in that order is how you find out whether you understood it.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Take one of your pairs.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Take one of your pairs. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At We Do 2, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Take one of your pairs” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Take one of your pairs” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Take one of your pairs” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Independent · evidence

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

9 min
Independent · evidence

Independent · evidence

Three pairs on the sheet

Work on your own. Write your three pairs on the sheet.

For each pair, write one sentence saying what is the same.

Then write one reason from the first card and one from the second.

Use the words on the card, said your way.

If you finish early, say which pair surprised you most, and why.

Number your pairs one, two and three so the sentences and the reasons stay together.

Write the group's name at the start of each reason.

If two of your pairs are about the same thing, swap one and find a different pair.

Three pairs about food is really one pair, done three times.

Read your sentence back before you move to the next pair. A vague one is easiest to catch straight after writing it.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Write your three pairs on the sheet.
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Write your three pairs on the sheet. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At Independent, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Write your three pairs on the sheet” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Write your three pairs on the sheet” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Write your three pairs on the sheet” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on: Exit · Audience and Influence

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.

3 min
Exit · Audience and Influence

Exit · Audience and Influence

SPACE: the learner may pause or choose a private response.

VOICE: the evidence statement remains in the learner’s chosen communication mode.

AUDIENCE: a familiar adult receives and names back exactly what was heard or seen.

INFLUENCE: one real next action is recorded: retain, add method detail, or leave open.

Read one pair to an adult

Choose your clearest pair and read it to the adult at your table.

Say what is the same first, then the two reasons.

They read it back exactly as you said it.

If that is not what you meant, say it again and they write the new one.

Then choose what happens next: keep the sheet, find a fourth pair, or write your question down.

Your choice goes on the sheet before you leave.

The cards go back in the pack face up, in the order they came out.

The sheet goes in your folder with the date on the top line.

Feedback loop
SPACE
VOICE · Choose your clearest pair and read it…
AUDIENCE
INFLUENCE

SPACE available · VOICE waiting · AUDIENCE waiting · INFLUENCE waiting

Say or show what the source says here: Choose your clearest pair and read it to the adult at your table. Point, sign, repeat after the adult, demonstrate, Earwig clip, choice board.

At Exit, an adult receives it and names back what they heard, in your words. R goes on only after that.

Not yet / needs help → reduce the prompt: take the first step of “Choose your clearest pair and read it to the adult at your table” with the smallest prompt that works, then wait.

Did it with support → same task, new example: “Choose your clearest pair and read it to the adult at your table” again with a fresh example and one prompt fewer.

Did it independently → explain a reason: ask why for “Choose your clearest pair and read it to the adult at your table” and take the reason in the pupil’s own mode.

Did it and explained → move on. Then choose what happens next: keep the sheet, find a fourth pair, or write your question down.

SPACE VOICE AUDIENCE INFLUENCE SPACE stays available. VOICE is received. AUDIENCE names back exactly. INFLUENCE changes one real next action.

Feedback codes (staff): VF Verbal feedback given here · WS Worked with support · I Independent · NS + Next step — one specific thing · E Evidence on Earwig · R Responded — loop closed · // Self-edit point · ? Read this back to me

Space — the conditions that make response possible:

  • Regulation first. A dysregulated student cannot respond to feedback. Co-regulation, sensory tools and time take priority over the technical content of the feedback.
  • No public comparison. No grade boards, no "look how X has improved."
  • Permission to refuse. A student who declines to respond today is not punished — refusal is information.

Earwig, lean capture (E): 30-second clip, photo, or one-line context note. Central tags only. Listen / look before tagging (Audience).

Feedback & Marking Policy 2025/2026 (Pilot), Issue 1 — body sections 5, 11, 12 and 13, quoted.